Please login or register.

Login with email, password and session length
 

News:

Happy Holidays!


Author Topic: The Marvel Thread  (Read 167867 times)

Offline HarryTrotter

  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 3061
Re: The Marvel Thread
« Reply #3660 on: February 03, 2019, 06:50:27 AM »
Asm #13-14
Frank Grimes.Junior. ☺️
The Simpsons didnt invent that one,but I keept thinking Frank Grimes Jr the whole time.
From #14___ Peter,you are only in your mid 20s.
No,not even in comic book time.No way.
''Even our origin stories have gone sour.''
Jon Farmer

Offline Silver Shocker

  • Cuddly mascot
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 2495
  • May the Porg be with you.
Re: The Marvel Thread
« Reply #3661 on: February 13, 2019, 07:17:10 AM »
 ^_^ I was thinking the same thing, in both cases.
"I just love doing cameos!"
~Stan Lee, 1922-2018

Offline HarryTrotter

  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 3061
Re: The Marvel Thread
« Reply #3662 on: February 13, 2019, 01:07:57 PM »
Maybe Im just being obsessive about it,but by last count Fantastic Four #1 happened in 2001 (and Reed and Ben were WW2 veterans,but thats a story for another day) and assuming Peter was 15-16 at the time thats means hes now around 35-36.
Either avoid that question or at least try to keep up with your own internal logic.
Granted,quite a few people pointed out that 2001 date doesnt really work in the scope of the greater shared universe,but lets go with that for the sake of having a starting point.
''Even our origin stories have gone sour.''
Jon Farmer

Offline Silver Shocker

  • Cuddly mascot
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 2495
  • May the Porg be with you.
Re: The Marvel Thread
« Reply #3663 on: February 13, 2019, 11:40:08 PM »
Oh I know what you mean. I've been thinking about it since last night. Flash Thompson no longer served in Vietnam because if he did that'd make him around Stallone's age. But he did serve in Afganistan. Ditto Tony Stark being in the middle east, as adapted in the Iron Man movie.

But I was thinking about "teenager-turned young-adult" characters that debuted at least a decade after Peter Parker. If Pete's in his mid twenties, then what does that make Richie Rider, Cannonball, Sunspot, Danielle Moonstar, Wolfsbane, Speedball, Kitty Pryde, Jubilee, Darkhawk, and probably a bunch I forgot about?

Of course, I remember when Roger Stern did a sequel to "Nothing can Stop The Juggernaut" in post-OMD Spidey, and claimed the original 1982 storyline happened "months ago."

Then again, over at DC, Batman's entire comic history apparently happened in the span of 10 years.
« Last Edit: March 09, 2019, 07:57:52 AM by Silver Shocker »
"I just love doing cameos!"
~Stan Lee, 1922-2018

Offline Deaths Jester

  • Drunken Arse!!
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 4414
Re: The Marvel Thread
« Reply #3664 on: February 14, 2019, 12:03:45 AM »
Aside from Astro City - whose timeline runs congruent with the real world - all the comic timelines are borked. Just think, when they aged Cap A over at Marvel they only went to his mid-sixties/early seventies even though he served during WW2. He should've been about a hundred with a walker or a wheelchair, not a buffed up sixty-ish.

Course if the timelines made any sense, half of the major characters would be dead of old age by now...
Avatar picture originally a Brom painting entitled Marionette.

Offline HarryTrotter

  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 3061
Re: The Marvel Thread
« Reply #3665 on: February 14, 2019, 06:24:59 AM »
Few that I can remember...Hellblazer ran in real time.So does Judge Dredd.
Punisher is also no longer a Vietnam vet.But Magneto is still a Holocaust survivor.Granted dying and coming back to life a few times could explain that.And Magneto was at one point de-aged to a baby.
IIRC sometimes in the new 52 Batman said hes been doing this for 12 years so he has to be at least in is mid 30's or close to 40.
''Even our origin stories have gone sour.''
Jon Farmer

Offline HarryTrotter

  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 3061
Re: The Marvel Thread
« Reply #3666 on: February 27, 2019, 07:41:53 PM »
Asm #16 We reached our first event.I knew how this was going to play out,but clone army of Kravens would have been cooler.
Also the animal theme/totemism from JMS era.I hope Morlun isnt around at least.
''Even our origin stories have gone sour.''
Jon Farmer

Offline Tomato

  • The Original AA
  • Titans
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 5905
  • Hufflepuff Pride
    • Hero Force
Re: The Marvel Thread
« Reply #3667 on: March 03, 2019, 07:13:17 PM »
So I want to interject the constant asm bashfest (which... Yeah no I dropped the book awhile ago. I tried, even caught up because the new scorpion design looked decent enough... But no, didn't hold my interest.) to bash the Xmen books right now because I recently caught up with a few things and dang if I don't hate what I've read.

Execution/xtermination/that book that finally put an end to the past Xmen in the present nonsense- Now, let's be clear: it's a move that's been needed for awhile. I enjoyed them while they were around, but with real Jean alive again, it was time for them to go back.

That does not, however, excuse how that book was handled. In order to "neatly" wrap up the original Xmen's return, side characters from their book are killed off in gruesome fashion, several characters are killed off just... because, character growth is jettisoned for the sake of magic mind control hound nonsense, and the entire book exists to tease Cyclops' resurrection.

Return of Wolverine- I don't even know where to begin here. So... Wolverine is resurrected by a mutant who controls zombies but she let his mind go for reasons and even though she knows he's rebelling she takes him to her murder satellite expecting the mutant superhero to... Not stop her from killing all of Earth's population? Also she built this without being detected in a world with Tony Stark, Reed Richards and Victor Von Doom? Whaaat?!?!

It then insults me by plugging a follow-up book involving the infinity guantlet that involved the spirits of the infinity stones and I just wanted to read a freaking Wolverine story.

Uncanny X-men- I hated the whole story with Xman and Legion. It's dumb and full of false depth and gives Xman a Messiah complex out of nowhere (I know they justify it in the ending but the justification is stupid) and it all ends up with another "no more mutants" mess in which all the Xmen are supposedly dead.

The only, ONLY good thing to come out of the xbooks is... Despite hating the lead in and hating the tone and not caring for either's resurrection, I DO appreciate the Wolverine and Cyclops putting aside their problems and working together dynamic. They haven't done much but fight off some hate groups and piss off cap, but I do like the dynamic.

Sorry, binged some various xbooks last weekend and needed to vent.

Offline Deaths Jester

  • Drunken Arse!!
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 4414
Re: The Marvel Thread
« Reply #3668 on: March 03, 2019, 09:33:19 PM »
Hmm...return of the 80s grimness with the idiocy of the 90s? Sounds like the industry has forgotten how to write plain stories that aren't "events" that span multiple books. Ah, to wish for the days when you could have a good full story plus snippets of future/ongoing plots sprinkled about in a single comic book...
Avatar picture originally a Brom painting entitled Marionette.

Offline HarryTrotter

  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 3061
Re: The Marvel Thread
« Reply #3669 on: March 07, 2019, 10:55:53 AM »
This weeks quote from Stans soapbox is how they are always trying to entertain and not editorialize.As such they try to keep their personal opinions out of their sagas.
Marvel in 2019 is quoting this.Are they being sarcarstic or are they that funting self unaware?
You are editorializing and personal opinions far outweight the entertainment in your book.So dont spit in our faces and then try to hide behind Stan Lee.
''Even our origin stories have gone sour.''
Jon Farmer

Offline detourne_me

  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 6123
  • Manipulator of mental motion sickness
    • Force of Paradox!
Re: The Marvel Thread
« Reply #3670 on: March 08, 2019, 08:01:05 AM »
Has anyone else been reading the Age of X-Man stuff?
I loved AoA so much i thougut I'd try all of the first issues for this. NextGen and Marvelous X-Men were pretty good. While Nightcrawler was so-so and Xtremists was just garbage. I just read Prisoner X, and its interesting seeing Bishop be the one linked to the real world again. I'm looking forward to tye Apocalypse book, cause it seems interesting. It seems like the AoA analogues will carry over in terms of quality of the book too. Marvelous X-Men is like Astonishing X-Men, which was good. Both Generation Next and NextGen are really great, and X-Tremists is more like Factor X... weak.

Offline Silver Shocker

  • Cuddly mascot
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 2495
  • May the Porg be with you.
Re: The Marvel Thread
« Reply #3671 on: March 09, 2019, 08:01:59 AM »
Haven't read any new X-Men stuff in a long while. The last one I read was Soule's Astonishing X-Men. I thought that was decent. It seemed like it was doing a little cross-media synergy with the Legion Tv show and the newer movies.

There was an annual by a different writer that I didn't read, but it brought back the alien that called himself Luficer from the original Stan Lee run of X-Men. The one who was originally responsible for the loss of Xavier's ability to walk, before that got retconned. The character made very few appearances after that.
"I just love doing cameos!"
~Stan Lee, 1922-2018

Offline kkhohoho

  • Evil (but a hero) Santa Claus look-a-like
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 3171
  • "He sees you when you're sleeping...
    • The Golden Age: Not Your Ordinary Fanfic
Re: The Marvel Thread
« Reply #3672 on: March 10, 2019, 03:48:01 AM »
Haven't read any X-Men books since around 2014 or so. If they let mutants make some darn progress instead of facing extermination every other week, maybe I'll start picking them up again.
The Golden Age; 'A different look at a different era.'

http://archiveofourown.org/works/1089779/chapters/2193203

Offline Silver Shocker

  • Cuddly mascot
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 2495
  • May the Porg be with you.
Re: The Marvel Thread
« Reply #3673 on: March 10, 2019, 06:57:08 AM »
As I've said before, I did a hard boybott on X-Men during the X-Men vs Inhuman business. Only Spider-Man/Deadpool was exempt from it. Mind you, the X-Men books weren't really putting out anything I wanted to pick up at the time anyway. Astonishing came out after IVX, so I picked that up, which I liked, but the later stuff has lost me.

And yes, I think X-Men especially has a problem we see a lot with Marvel and DC these days; they're doing status-quo shaking events too often to tell enjoyable stories with the status quo and characters they do have. Well, that and they keep going "Let's just kill off whoever editorial will let us kill, and let the readers look them up on the fan wiki" as a substitute for a good story.

Right now, I'd rather just read my Essential reprints I never got around to reading. Much more enjoyable, honestly. With those, even the stuff that's kinda bad is still good, because it becomes a charming element of the era the books came from. The modern comics really do not benefit from this factor.
« Last Edit: March 10, 2019, 07:04:11 AM by Silver Shocker »
"I just love doing cameos!"
~Stan Lee, 1922-2018

Offline HarryTrotter

  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 3061
Re: The Marvel Thread
« Reply #3674 on: March 11, 2019, 08:18:54 PM »
Shaking up the status quo is only needed if you have a status quo.If you cant have 2 issues without tying into some event,then your events ARE the status quo.
Event-aftermath/prequel-Event+Spiderman crossover+X-men event-aftermath/prequel-Infinity something...
''Even our origin stories have gone sour.''
Jon Farmer

Offline Tomato

  • The Original AA
  • Titans
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 5905
  • Hufflepuff Pride
    • Hero Force
Re: The Marvel Thread
« Reply #3675 on: March 13, 2019, 01:36:07 AM »
Just read Uncanny X-men 13...

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

Offline HarryTrotter

  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 3061
Re: The Marvel Thread
« Reply #3676 on: March 15, 2019, 04:21:20 PM »
Not to hijack the movie thread- IIRC Wasp came up with the name Avengers because she thought it sounded hip.Was that ever retconed?Or any other explanation given?
''Even our origin stories have gone sour.''
Jon Farmer

Offline Silver Shocker

  • Cuddly mascot
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 2495
  • May the Porg be with you.
Re: The Marvel Thread
« Reply #3677 on: March 17, 2019, 05:36:43 AM »
You are correct. That was in the very first issue of the Avengers. Was it ever further retconned or expanded in the comics? I don't recall. I'd guess if it was, the most likely place would be in those Joe Casey "Avengers: Earth's Mightiest Heroes" miniseries that go back to the early days of the team (which also includes the mini "Hulk Smashes the Avengers") but I haven't read those yet. Maybe I'll have to give them a read sometime.
"I just love doing cameos!"
~Stan Lee, 1922-2018

Offline HarryTrotter

  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 3061
Re: The Marvel Thread
« Reply #3678 on: March 17, 2019, 06:27:23 AM »

It still seems like thats the case.And you think Tony should remember,he was there.
''Even our origin stories have gone sour.''
Jon Farmer

Offline Silver Shocker

  • Cuddly mascot
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 2495
  • May the Porg be with you.
Re: The Marvel Thread
« Reply #3679 on: March 17, 2019, 06:53:34 AM »
Man, I read that when it came out, and didn't even remember.

Also, yeah, I enjoyed that run, but that's some bullcrap. Tony doesn't remember (or pretends not to, which is a d-bag move, even for post Downey Tony) And Ms. Marvel knows (how? Well, I guess that's less important than having her "Um, actually" a founding Avenger) and Tony basically bashes the Wasp behind her back? Are we sure Remender didn't write this?

Oh, on a not-particularly-related note, I'm reading some recent Marvel comics the other night, when I see an ad for a Realm of Kings tie-in, and what do I see?

"Realm of Kings: Journey into Mystery" featuring, among other characters, Death Lockett! So she does exist and somebody decided to use her? Coolio, Now if they could just do that for Gravity, the Eli Bradley Patriot, Wiccan, Hulkling, Speed, Cassie Lang, pretty much all of the Thunderbolts.... (oh right, just gotta wait for the movies to come out)

Also, I love how you can tell just from the cover that she's still "Angsty, unlikable" Death Lockett. I mean Arcade can make later appearances that don't reference or play off Avengers Arena/Undercover in any way, shape or form, but apparently the same does not apply to her...ok...
« Last Edit: March 17, 2019, 07:10:43 AM by Silver Shocker »
"I just love doing cameos!"
~Stan Lee, 1922-2018

Offline HarryTrotter

  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 3061
Re: The Marvel Thread
« Reply #3680 on: March 17, 2019, 09:47:33 AM »
Because she a super special awesome fangirl?And Tony might have been drunk?
Wasp was only around for a month?Just the first team or do you count her entire tenure as an Avenger?She left and rejoined a few times,but its probably a bit more then a month?

Its funny that you can pick any page of any post-2015 Marvel comics and find at least 2 things that dont make sense.

Seems like the current batch of "writers" only knows about 3 villains:Doctor Doom,Taskmaster and Arcade.What is this opsession with Arcade?
« Last Edit: March 17, 2019, 09:51:39 AM by HarryTrotter »
''Even our origin stories have gone sour.''
Jon Farmer